Search | Statistics | User Listing Forums | Calendars | Skins
Piredeu Open Forum
Piredeu Open Forum ->  Candidate survey -> Proposal and Discussion Area (read only) -> View Thread

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

EP Committee question
Moderators: BernhardWessels

Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Candidate survey -> Proposal and Discussion Area (read only)Message format
 
bjorn
Posted 13/6/2008 07:42 (#51)
Subject: EP Committee question


New user

Posts: 2

Rank the top 3 committees you would prefer to serve on in order of
preferences
Top of the page Bottom of the page
SaraHobolt
Posted 16/7/2008 17:19 (#110 - in reply to #51)
Subject: RE: EP Committee question




Posts: 26
25
Location: University of Oxford, UK
Dear Bjorn,

Thank you for submitting this proposal to the Open Forum. The PIREDEU Steering Committee met at the end of June to evaluate each of the proposals. We assessed them on the basis of whether they met the following criteria:

* An explicit argument about why the proposed question/coding category merited inclusion in one or more of the PIREDEU data components.

* An explicit argument about the conceptual and theoretical foundations of the question/coding category.

* An explicit case for how the question/coding category facilitates integration and linking of several data components. The PIREDEU Steering Committee preferred proposals that allowed for conceptual integration across the five data components (i.e. voter survey, candidate survey, media study, manifestos and contextual data).

* An explicit consideration of how the proposed question/coding category linked with questions/coding categories in past data collection efforts.

The PIREDEU Steering Committee favoured proposals that ensured over time and across instrument comparability. Moreover, given that the voter and candidate surveys can only contain a limited number of question items, priority was given to proposals with succinct question formats.

On this basis we ranked each question in the proposal as follows:

(1) The proposed item will be included in data collection instrument
(2) High priority proposal that will be included if space and time constraints permit
(3) Proposal can only be included if additional funding is secured
(4) Proposed item is not a priority

The item(s) from your proposal received the following ranking(s):

Instrument: Candidate Survey

Rank the top 3 committees you would prefer to serve on in order of preferences.
Ranking: 1

Rationale: This question will be included in the candidate survey.


Thank you again for your participation in this process. We hope that you will continue to use the Open Forum to comment on the questionnaires/codebook that will be posted online on the Forum in the autumn.

Yours sincerely,


Mark Franklin
Chair of the PIREDEU Steering Committee

Sara Hobolt
Deputy Chair of the PIREDEU Steering Committee


Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread
http://alicefilm.com/ - http://alittleboysblog.net/ - http://brasssolutions.com/ - http://brunodunker.com/

(Delete all cookies set by this site)
Running MegaBBS ASP Forum Software
© 2002-2017 PD9 Software