2 suggestions for contextual data
bjorn
Posted 13/6/2008 07:45 (#52)
Subject: 2 suggestions for contextual data


New user

Posts: 2

1) Description of the candidate selection process for each party in each
country
2) Extent of party funding for EP election campaign compared to funding
for the national election campaign (in € and in relative terms)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
SaraHobolt
Posted 16/7/2008 17:32 (#114 - in reply to #52)
Subject: RE: 2 suggestions for contextual data




Posts: 26
25
Location: University of Oxford, UK
Dear Bjorn,

Thank you for submitting this proposal to the Open Forum. The PIREDEU Steering Committee met at the end of June to evaluate each of the proposals. We assessed them on the basis of whether they met the following criteria:

* An explicit argument about why the proposed question/coding category merited inclusion in one or more of the PIREDEU data components.

* An explicit argument about the conceptual and theoretical foundations of the question/coding category.

* An explicit case for how the question/coding category facilitates integration and linking of several data components. The PIREDEU Steering Committee preferred proposals that allowed for conceptual integration across the five data components (i.e. voter survey, candidate survey, media study, manifestos and contextual data).

* An explicit consideration of how the proposed question/coding category linked with questions/coding categories in past data collection efforts.

The PIREDEU Steering Committee favoured proposals that ensured over time and across instrument comparability. Moreover, given that the voter and candidate surveys can only contain a limited number of question items, priority was given to proposals with succinct question formats.

On this basis we ranked each question in the proposal as follows:

(1) The proposed item will be included in data collection instrument
(2) High priority proposal that will be included if space and time constraints permit
(3) Proposal can only be included if additional funding is secured
(4) Proposed item is not a priority

The item(s) from your proposal received the following ranking(s):


Instrument: Contextual Data

1) Description of the candidate selection process for each party in each country.
Ranking: 1
2) Extent of party funding for EP election campaign compared to funding for the national election campaign (in € and in relative terms)
Ranking: 1

Rationale: The contextual data team agreed to collect this data.

Thank you again for your participation in this process. We hope that you will continue to use the Open Forum to comment on the questionnaires/codebook that will be posted online on the Forum in the autumn.

Yours sincerely,


Mark Franklin
Chair of the PIREDEU Steering Committee

Sara Hobolt
Deputy Chair of the PIREDEU Steering Committee




Top of the page Bottom of the page